Mehmet Emre Tiryaki
Back to Notes

Eigenvalues and Diagonalization

Eigenvalues

When Ax=λxAx = \lambda x with x≠0x \neq 0, λ\lambda is an eigenvalue with eigenvector xx. Singular matrices have 0 as an eigenvalue.

The characteristic polynomial is

pA(t)=det⁡(tI−A)p_A(t) = \det(tI - A)

det⁡(λI−A)=0⇒λ\det(\lambda I - A) = 0 \Rightarrow \lambda is an eigenvalue, since λI−A\lambda I - A has a nontrivial kernel. So the roots of pAp_A are the eigenvalues.

eigspace(λ)=ker⁡(λI−A)=span{eigenvectors of λ}\mathrm{eigspace}(\lambda) = \ker(\lambda I - A) = \mathrm{span}\{\text{eigenvectors of } \lambda\}

σ(A)\sigma(A) is the spectrum of AA, the set of its eigenvalues.

  • almu(λ)\mathrm{almu}(\lambda) is the multiplicity of λ\lambda as a root of pAp_A,
  • gemu(λ)=dim⁡(eigspace(λ))\mathrm{gemu}(\lambda) = \dim(\mathrm{eigspace}(\lambda)),
  • 1≤gemu(λ)≤almu(λ)1 \le \mathrm{gemu}(\lambda) \le \mathrm{almu}(\lambda).

The spectral radius is ρ(A)=max⁡λ∈σ(A)∣λ∣\rho(A) = \max_{\lambda \in \sigma(A)} |\lambda|.

Eigenvectors of Distinct Eigenvalues

If F\mathfrak{F} is a collection of eigenvectors of distinct eigenvalues, then F\mathfrak{F} is linearly independent.

Proof Suppose not, and take x1,…,xk∈Fx_1, \ldots, x_k \in \mathfrak{F} linearly dependent with kk least. Then

α1x1+⋯+αkxk=0\alpha_1 x_1 + \cdots + \alpha_k x_k = 0

with all αi≠0\alpha_i \neq 0 by minimality. Applying AA,

λ1α1x1+⋯+λkαkxk=0\lambda_1 \alpha_1 x_1 + \cdots + \lambda_k \alpha_k x_k = 0

Subtracting λ1\lambda_1 times the first equation,

(λ2−λ1)α2x2+⋯+(λk−λ1)αkxk=0(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1) \alpha_2 x_2 + \cdots + (\lambda_k - \lambda_1) \alpha_k x_k = 0

a dependence among k−1k - 1 of them with nonzero coefficients, contradicting minimality.

Diagonalization

If A,BA, B are similar then pA=pBp_A = p_B.

AA is diagonalizable when it's similar to a diagonal matrix. AA is diagonalizable   ⟺  \iff AA has nn linearly independent eigenvectors.

Proof A=SDS−1  ⟺  AS=SDA = SDS^{-1} \iff AS = SD, which column by column reads

A[S(1)∣⋯∣S(n)]=[S(1)∣⋯∣S(n)][d11⋱dnn]A[S^{(1)} | \cdots | S^{(n)}] = [S^{(1)} | \cdots | S^{(n)}] \begin{bmatrix} d_{11} & & \\ & \ddots & \\ & & d_{nn} \end{bmatrix}

i.e. AS(i)=diiS(i)AS^{(i)} = d_{ii} S^{(i)}, and the S(i)S^{(i)} are linearly independent iff S−1S^{-1} exists.

So nn distinct eigenvalues ⇒\Rightarrow diagonalizable.

Trace and Determinant

Let SiS_i be the sum of all products of ii of the eigenvalues, and EiE_i the sum of all i×ii \times i principal minors,

Si=∑1≤j1<⋯<ji≤nλj1⋯λji,Ei=∑M an i×i principalsubmatrix of Adet⁡MS_i = \sum_{1 \le j_1 < \cdots < j_i \le n} \lambda_{j_1} \cdots \lambda_{j_i}, \qquad E_i = \sum_{\substack{M \text{ an } i \times i \text{ principal} \\ \text{submatrix of } A}} \det M

So S1=∑λiS_1 = \sum \lambda_i and E1=tr(A)E_1 = \mathrm{tr}(A). Expanding pAp_A two ways,

pA(t)=tn−S1tn−1+S2tn−2−⋯+(−1)nSn=tn−E1tn−1+E2tn−2−⋯+(−1)nEn\begin{aligned} p_A(t) &= t^n - S_1 t^{n-1} + S_2 t^{n-2} - \cdots + (-1)^n S_n \\ &= t^n - E_1 t^{n-1} + E_2 t^{n-2} - \cdots + (-1)^n E_n \end{aligned}

So Si=EiS_i = E_i, which gives

tr(A)=∑iλi,det⁡(A)=∏iλi\mathrm{tr}(A) = \sum_i \lambda_i, \qquad \det(A) = \prod_i \lambda_i

Block Triangular Matrices

σ([C11∗0⋱])=⋃iσ(Cii)\sigma\left(\begin{bmatrix} C_{11} & * \\ 0 & \ddots \end{bmatrix}\right) = \bigcup_i \sigma(C_{ii})

since

pC(t)=det⁡(tI−C)=det⁡[tI−C11∗0⋱]=∏idet⁡(tI−Cii)p_C(t) = \det(tI - C) = \det \begin{bmatrix} tI - C_{11} & * \\ 0 & \ddots \end{bmatrix} = \prod_i \det(tI - C_{ii})

ABAB and BABA

For A∈Mm,nA \in M_{m,n}, B∈Mn,mB \in M_{n,m} with n≥mn \ge m,

pBA(t)=tn−mpAB(t)p_{BA}(t) = t^{n-m} p_{AB}(t)

Proof

[AB0B0][IA0I]=[ABABABBA]=[IA0I][00BBA]\begin{bmatrix} AB & 0 \\ B & 0 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} I & A \\ 0 & I \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} AB & ABA \\ B & BA \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} I & A \\ 0 & I \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 0 \\ B & BA \end{bmatrix}

so the two block matrices are similar, and their characteristic polynomials give tnpAB(t)=tmpBA(t)t^n p_{AB}(t) = t^m p_{BA}(t). In particular

σ(AB)∪{0}=σ(BA)∪{0}\sigma(AB) \cup \{0\} = \sigma(BA) \cup \{0\}

Simultaneous Diagonalization

A,BA, B are simultaneously diagonalizable if there is an SS such that S−1ASS^{-1}AS and S−1BSS^{-1}BS are both diagonal.

For diagonalizable A,BA, B: AB=BA  ⟺  A,BAB = BA \iff A, B are simultaneously diagonalizable.

(⇐)(\Leftarrow) A=SDS−1A = SDS^{-1}, B=SD′S−1B = SD'S^{-1}, so AB=SDD′S−1=SD′DS−1=BAAB = SDD'S^{-1} = SD'DS^{-1} = BA.

If A,B∈MnA, B \in M_n commute, there is a permutation π\pi of {1,…,n}\{1, \ldots, n\} such that

σ(A+B)={λi(A)+λπ(i)(B):i=1,…,n},σ(AB)={λi(A)λπ(i)(B):i=1,…,n}\sigma(A + B) = \{\lambda_i(A) + \lambda_{\pi(i)}(B) : i = 1, \ldots, n\}, \qquad \sigma(AB) = \{\lambda_i(A) \lambda_{\pi(i)}(B) : i = 1, \ldots, n\}

Idempotent Matrices

Let A2=AA^2 = A. If Ax=λxAx = \lambda x then λx=A2x=λ2x\lambda x = A^2 x = \lambda^2 x, so every eigenvalue is 1 or 0. Since t2−tt^2 - t annihilates AA and has distinct roots, AA is diagonalizable (see minimal polynomial).

Then A=SDS−1A = SDS^{-1}, AS=SDAS = SD, where the first rr columns of SS are a basis for E1\mathcal{E}_1 and the rest a basis for E0\mathcal{E}_0,

A[ S(1)∣⋯∣S(r)∣S(r+1)∣⋯∣S(n) ]=[ S(1)∣⋯∣S(r)∣S(r+1)∣⋯∣S(n) ]DA[\, S^{(1)} | \cdots | S^{(r)} \mid S^{(r+1)} | \cdots | S^{(n)} \,] = [\, S^{(1)} | \cdots | S^{(r)} \mid S^{(r+1)} | \cdots | S^{(n)} \,] D

For all x∈Cnx \in \mathbb{C}^n there are unique v∈E1v \in \mathcal{E}_1, w∈E0w \in \mathcal{E}_0 with x=v+wx = v + w, and Ax=Av+Aw=vAx = Av + Aw = v. So AA is a projection onto E1\mathcal{E}_1 along E0\mathcal{E}_0.

Gersgorin Disks

For A∈MnA \in M_n, the iith Gersgorin disk is centered at the diagonal entry with radius the moduli of the rest of the row summed,

Di={z∈C:∣z−aii∣≤∑j≠i∣aij∣},G(A)=⋃i=1nDiD_i = \Big\{z \in \mathbb{C} : |z - a_{ii}| \le \sum_{j \neq i} |a_{ij}|\Big\}, \qquad G(A) = \bigcup_{i=1}^{n} D_i

σ(A)⊆G(A)\sigma(A) \subseteq G(A), and if a connected component of G(A)G(A) consists of kk disks, then exactly kk eigenvalues (counting multiplicity) are in it.